Reader Questions – Lenses & PaintShop Pro

Whew! I’m getting loads of questions for reader question Wednesdays! I thought it was unfair to string them out for weeks on end so I’ll answer a few at a time.

{LENSES}

Annika T. asked:

Q. What camera & lens combo do you use (most often)?

A. Oooh I love talking about my lenses :)

I use a Canon 7D and I have 4 lenses: An 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.4, 24mm 2.8 and an 18-200mm IS lens. The advantages to these (in my opinion) are thus:

  • 85mm f/1.8 –  85mm is known as the portrait lens and I only use it for grown ups since I don’t have to chase them. 85mm is pretty ‘zoomy’, that is, you’d have to be pretty far away from your subject. A few good metres for a portrait. Note that this is a prime lens. That is, it doesn’t zoom. It’s fixed at 85mm
  • 50mm f/1.4 – This is my baby! If you only bought 1 lens, it would be this. It’s nickname is the ‘Nifty Fifty’. Sharp. Clear. Fast. FAB!
  • 24mm – the widest fixed lens I own. Wide is good for landscape but you know I mostly do portraits so this one seldom sees the light. If I want to throw my camera in my handbag for a day out, I’ll attach this because it’s the flattest lens I own.
  • 18-200mm – this is my only zoom lens. I use it often for convenience (aka: laziness) and in the studio when I can’t be fast enough on my feet to catch the kiddies the way I want to.

You might be thinking how on earth a lens that doesn’t zoom could be any good. When I questioned a friend about how I would get closer and further away with a prime lens, he said, “you’ve got feet don’t you?” Best advice ever.

Oh I forgot to answer the question! The lens I use most often is the 50mm 1.4.

________________________________________________________

Joanne S. asked:

Q. I’ve been reading a few reviews recently on the Canon 50mm f/1.8 lens, but I thought I would ask your expert opinion…I don’t think it has image stabilization built in. Do you use any lenses without IS in them, if so, how do you keep your images consistently sharp with minimal blur from handshake?

A. Weeeeell Joanne. I bought a 50mm 1.8, attached it to my camera, grimaced and promptly stuck it on Ebay. It was the worst thing I’ve ever punished my camera with. It was loud, couldn’t focus itself and I didn’t manage to get one good shot. That said, it can be a good one if you’re not photographing things that move and you have an eye for manual focus. Sorry to burst your bubble :( It costs hundreds less than a 50mm 1.4 because it’s made of plastic (sooo sorry to give you that bad news!). I’m sure people have had success with them, though, otherwise they wouldn’t be selling them.

About IS (Image Stabilisation): Only one of my lenses (18-200mm) has IS. I am always very vigilant about balancing my exposure triangle in the optimal way to reduce any camera shake. I avoid low light and when I’m in it, I use my Speedlite flash to bounce off a nearby wall (never point a flash at your subject!) Also, look for tutorials about how to properly hold a camera and a good stance for stability and you should be fine.

As far as affordable goes? That’s all relative and changes from person to person. If you’re looking for an inexpensive hobby, consider something other than photography. Let’s put it this way: I used to be a shoe-buying, accessory-loving, needless-expensive-makeup-hounding woman. Now, I’m an ASDA-sale-scouring, drug-store-makeup-wearing, who-needs-more-shoes? type of girl and it’s just because I’m addicted to buying glass. :*) I’d save up the nearly £400 and buy a 50mm 1.4 and you’ll be set for life!

{COREL PAINT SHOP PRO}

Alicia J. asked

Q. My question for you is in regards to photo editing.  Have you ever used Corel Paint Shop Pro and do you know where I can find some good tips on editing pictures with it.  I’ve noticed that most sites discuss Adobe Photo Shop or Photo Shop Elements.  Paint Shop Pro came free with my laptop and I don’t know that I want to invest in more software until I build my skills up.

A. I’ve never used anything other than Lightroom & Photoshop. When I first discovered editing, I played with Google Picasa, but you’re probably far beyond that by now. I would ask you this question, though: How will you build up your skills without the tools to do that? A weight lifter can’t build his muscles until he picks up the barbells. You might be surprised to know that PSE costs less than £80 while Corel PaintShop costs £59. Not that much different and you can find more tutorials and education about using PSE which will help you a great deal to build up your skills. And here’s a link to download a free 30 day trial! You will learn A LOT in 30 days.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • http://nahnen.blogspot.com Nichole

    I’m not sure if you bought an older version of the 50mm f1.8 or if something was wrong with the one you purchased, but I own that lens and I think it’s really nice. It does have autofocus (I use it all of the time!), I find that it has nice colors and have been able to get plenty of great shots. Sure, the f1.4 will be nicer, but if you’re on a budget or not a professional, the f1.8 is a great value.

  • http://www.sandyalamode.com/ Sandy

    I have the 50mm F1.4 and I LOVE IT!! I also have the 28-135mm but it pretty much just sits in my camera bag most the time. The 50mm is a great clear lens, perfect for bokeh!

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/flamedot/ flamedot

    I would agree with Nichole. I have a Canon 50mm f/1.8 and it is the best! Yes it is plastic and noisy to boot, but it auto-focuses and you can pick one up for under £100 on Amazon. As a non-pro the f/1.8 suits just fine :)

  • Derek Clayton

    I have to agree with you Elizabeth, the 50mm 1.8 is…well…a $90 lens. While the cheap construction doesn’t bother me, the only time I find myself using it is when I need a faster lens than my 2.8 (which is only rarely…and only at night…). It’s not very sharp, but maybe I’m just spoiled from shooting with L lenses. It’s nice to have a lightweight lens, but in a sick way I kind of love the feel of a nice piece of heavy glass on my frame :)

  • Gillian Buick

    Another one who loves their 50mmf/1.8. Most reviews are good, even from pros. Like everything you get what you pay for I suppose!

  • Simone

    I agree with you on how the shopping interests have changed,
    Instead of buying clothing or whatever I want, I know find myself looking at photography sites, making price comparisons on lenses and other equipment. My current wish list includes the Canon EF 100mm 2.8 Macro lens. From the description and users comments, its seems as though that is the only lens I will ever need. It covers macro and portrait.

    Its so funny, you made the analogy, “A weight lifter can’t build his muscles until he picks up the barbells’ that’s so true, I’m never going to learn how to use the flash I purchased, if I leave it in the box!

    FLAMEDOT, thanks for providing your feedback on the 50mm 1.8,
    I saw it on amazon.com for $99 and thought about getting it as my first prime lens, as you pointed out, I’m not a pro either and this will satisfy my need for a prime lens and stay within my budget.

    I love your blog Elizabeth.

  • http://www.reddotstudio.ch hfng

    Great lens choices! I think the 85mm f1.8 is better than the f1.2 version in terms of price and faster autofocus and weight.

  • http://whoneedsashepherd.blogspot.com/ Nova

    As for working with photo editing software. I recently upgraded to LR 3, and I love it. But, I started with The GIMP (Google that shizz), and I loved it. Mainly because it’s free. Totally, completely free. Upgrades are free. Advice is free. And there ain’t no better price than free.

    But, there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch, either, and that runs true here as well. While it is free, very powerful, and very well-looked-after, it will require more work on your part. My workflow nowadays is this: 1) shoot, 2) upload to computer/import to LR (that’s freakin’ sweet), 3) edit, and 4) publish. All this, outside of the actually shooting, is done within LR (I don’t edit my photos very much at all anymore). I bring the photos in, edit, and publish to multiple locations all within Lightroom. You can’t do that with The GIMP. But, if you ever have any questions regarding The GIMP or its use, there are literally hundreds of forums, all packed with all the info you’d ever want, tutorials, how-to’s, etc.

    With The GIMP, my workflow was a bit different. Before I get into it, my archiving goes something like this (this is the folder tree as it appears in my computer): */my photos/D700/RAW/2011/03/*. So everything is contained within the folder which corresponds to the day it was shot, in the month it was shot, in the year, with which camera. The need for the “RAW” folder will be explained soon. Not too sophisticated, but it works for my needs. So, My workflow used to go like this: 1) shoot; 2) upload to computer into a Temp folder; 3) sort through photos and place into appropriate folders in my hierarchy; 4) preview them in Windows’ photo preview program, with a window open containing the images I was going through, and a window to move the ones I wanted to edit; 5) edit The Chosen Ones in The GIMP, using their UFRAW plugin; 6) take saved edited copies, and upload to Flickr.

    As you can see, the convenience of Lightroom wasn’t there, and that made for more work, and more time at the ‘puter. There’s the downside to using The GIMP. The upside, besides being super-totally-free, is that it is a great place to learn the basics (and more, if you’re so inclined) of image editing. You will learn all about layers and masks, you can make (UGH) HDR if you want, you can do vector graphics, even 3D modeling (though for rendering you want to use Blender). The terminology is the same or very similar to that of PS, so if you start with The GIMP and move on later, you’ll know what a layer mask is, what feathering will do, what different brushes will do, etc.

    Plus, it’s totally free.

  • http://whoneedsashepherd.blogspot.com/ Nova

    I forgot to explain the RAW thing. My computer can’t handle displaying NEF RAW images without a specialized editing program (like LR or The GIMP), and The GIMP is not very conducive to viewing a whole lot of photos at once. In fact, it’s rather terrible about it, like it won’t do it at all as far as I know. So, since The GIMP won’t show me all my photos at once, and windows preview won’t show RAW files, I used to shoot RAW + basic JPG, so I could see what each RAW file was. Now, I don’t have that problem, but since a lot of my photos are stored that way from before, I’ve left it…

    Not that all this explaining was really necessary…

  • Jmeeksphoto

    I also have the 50 1.4 and it stays on my 50d most of the time. Having had the 1.8, I can say that its worth it to wait for the 1.4. I had my 1.8 for only 5 months before it got stuck on my XSi (450d) during a wedding. Talk about learning to use a focal length. Its so very soft until f/2.5ish, which BTW is pretty sharp. But I feel that I bought a fast lens to use the wide aperture, so why not use it? You don’t buy the 85 1.2 to stop down do you ;)

  • Am

    Most of the time do you use af or manual focus using this 50mm lens?

B e   S o c i a l
S u b s c r i b e